Abstract

We perform an adjustment for observed-but-not-yet-reported cases (aka. nowcasting) for the epidemic curve of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak in Korea, 2015. The analysis is based on the publically available WHO data and aims at illustrating how one could do real-time public health surveillance during critical outbreaks.


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The markdown+Rknitr source code of this blog is available under a GNU General Public License (GPL v3) license from github.

Introduction

Short-range (0-6h) forecasts in the world of meteorology are also called nowcasts. The term has also found its way into real-time infectious disease monitoring where one of its uses has been to adjust the currently available epidemic curve during an outbreak for structural and reporting delays.

Whereas the original work in Höhle and an der Heiden (2014) was motivated by the large STEC O104:H4 outbreak in Germany 2011, one of our secondary motivations was to develop a tool the quantitative epidemiologist could use during similar high-profiled outbreaks (instead of having to re-invent the wheel during times of maximal stress). After my talk at the IBC2016 conference (slides of the talk) one of the questions from the audience was how much impact the work had in terms of being useful for other outbreaks. Besides an analysis of an Adenovirus outbreak and a recent analysis of an O157 outbreak, I was a little short on a convincing answer. In addition, when trying to make a quick analysis for the O157 outbreak with the currently available code in the surveillance package it became obvious that the nowcasting functionality in the package currently is a little rough and certainly in need of a user-friendliness polishing.

** Update 2020-04-21**: Regarding the lack of convincing answer mentioned above. Four years after writing this blog I can now add: The nowcast functionality of the package is now in use by the public health authorities in several German federal states as part of their Covid-19 outbreak response, see. e.g. Bavaria.

So this little blog-note serves three purposes:

  1. Illustrate how you can nowcasts with R, if you ever have to.
  2. Act as literate programming document for facilitating some code improvements of the nowcast function while providing a vignette supported story.
  3. Perform an analysis of the WHO open-data on the MERS-CoV outbreak in Korea in 2015.

The structure of this blog entry is as follows. We first discuss and visualize the WHO data on the MERS-CoV outbreak. The findings from the descriptive data analysis are then used to set up nowcasts adjusting the observed epidemic curve during the outbreak for reporting delays between onset of symptoms in cases and the date the case report arrived at the WHO. Finally, we illustrate how to visualize a sequence of nowcasts during an outbreak using an animation.

Data

The data basis for our analysis is the WHO data on the MERS-Cov outbreak in Korea, which occured during May-July 2015. Of interest will be the delay (here measured in days) between the time point on which a case has the onset of its MERS symptoms and the day the WHO learns about this case. In other words we put ourself in the role of an epidemiologist working at the WHO and who during the outbreak has to report on how the outbreak is evolving in Korea.

##Load library to read excel files
library("openxlsx")

##Obtain file from link found at (if it doesn't already exist)
##http://www.who.int/csr/don/21-july-2015-mers-korea/en/
if (!file.exists("../downloads/MERS-CoV-cases-rok-21Jul15.xlsx")) {
  download.file(url="http://www.who.int/entity/csr/disease/coronavirus_infections/MERS-CoV-cases-rok-21Jul15.xlsx?ua=1",destfile="../downloads/MERS-CoV-cases-rok-21Jul15.xlsx")
}

##Read data
linelist <- read.xlsx("../downloads/MERS-CoV-cases-rok-21Jul15.xlsx",startRow=4,detectDates=TRUE)

##Base R style - IMHO easier to understand than the dplyr way to do the same
for (dateCol in c("Date.of.notification.to.WHO","Date.of.symptoms.onset","Date.of.first.hospitalization","Date.of.laboratory.confirmation","Date.of.outcome")) {
  linelist[,dateCol] <- as.Date(linelist[,dateCol],format="%d/%m/%Y")
}

##Make a delay column
linelist$delay <- with(linelist,Date.of.notification.to.WHO - Date.of.symptoms.onset)

head(linelist,n=3)
##   Case.no. Date.of.notification.to.WHO Age Sex Health.care.worker Comorbidities
## 1        1                  2015-05-20  68   M                 No          <NA>
## 2        2                  2015-05-22  63   F                 No          <NA>
## 3        3                  2015-05-22  76   M                 No          <NA>
##   Date.of.symptoms.onset Date.of.first.hospitalization Date.of.laboratory.confirmation
## 1             2015-05-11                    2015-05-15                      2015-05-20
## 2             2015-05-19                          <NA>                      2015-05-20
## 3             2015-05-20                          <NA>                      2015-05-20
##     Status Date.of.outcome  delay
## 1    Alive            <NA> 9 days
## 2    Alive            <NA> 3 days
## 3 Deceased      2015-06-04 2 days

As the outbreak is already over, it is easy to visualize the epidemic curve in retrospect. We do so for the date of symptom onset.

##Show the epidemic curve as it occurs at the end of the outbreak
##using simple call to ggplot
ggplot2::ggplot( linelist, aes(x=Date.of.symptoms.onset)) + geom_histogram() + xlab("Date of onset of symptoms") + ylab("Number of cases")

Furthermore, we can look at the delay distribution as it looks at the end of the outbreak. We shall later look in more detail at this distribution, but for now the plot gives an idea about the range of the delay: in most cases the delay is between 1-14 days, actually 97.1% of the observations have a lag smaller or equal to \(D=14\). As a consequence, we shall use \(D=14\) as the maximum relevant lag to adjust for.

ggplot( linelist, aes(x=as.integer(delay),y=..prop..)) +
 stat_count() + scale_y_continuous(labels = scales::percent) + xlab("Delay (days)") + ylab("")

Instead of using ggplot to show the epidemic curve, this can also be done directly from the surveillance package using the function linelist2sts. This function takes a data.frame representing a linelist and converts this into an object of class sts (surveillance time series) used by the package. This then allows the use of all the plotting functionality of such objects as described in Salmon, Schumacher, and Höhle (2016). Note: For the nowcasting code of this blog entry to work, the newest development version of the package, i.e. version 1.12.2 available from Rforge using

install.packages("surveillance",repos="http://r-forge.r-project.org")

is needed. The code then looks as follows:

##Load surveillance pkg.
library("surveillance")

##Range of the symptom onset date variable
so_range <- range(linelist$Date.of.symptoms.onset,na.rm=TRUE)

##Create an sts time series from the linelist, which contains daily counts.
sts <- linelist2sts(linelist, dateCol="Date.of.symptoms.onset",aggregate.by="1 day",dRange=so_range)

##Show the resulting time series using the plot functionality for sts objects.
plot(sts,legend.opts=NULL,
     xaxis.tickFreq=list("%d"=atChange,"%m"=atChange),
     xaxis.labelFreq=list("%d"=at2ndChange),xaxis.labelFormat="%d-%b",
     xlab="Time (days)",lty=c(1,1,1,1),lwd=c(1,1,2),
     ylab="No. symptom onsets")

Nowcasting

We now move on to the nowcasts.

##State which date to nowcast
now <- as.Date("2015-06-12")

Say (in a mathematical sense) we move back time to 2015-06-12. In the notation of Höhle and an der Heiden (2014) this means \(T=2015-06-12\). We want to illustrate what the WHO could see at this point and, on the basis on the available reports at time \(T\), estimate the delay distribution and adjust the observed cases accordingly. We shall here only use the right-truncation delay adjusted procedure operating on the generalized Dirichlet distribution. Since the nowcasts for the time points very close to now are very volatile (i.e. have very large credibility regions), it’s opportune to not display these casts as they can be very hard to communicate. Also note that the selected date for now is selected such that enough cases are available to give a sufficiently reliable estimate for the delay distribution.

##Nowcasts are displayed up to time (now - safePredictLag)
safePredictLag <- 3
nowcastDates <- seq(from = so_range[1], to = now - safePredictLag, by = 1)

We now perform right-truncation adjusted Bayesian nowcasting using the generalized Dirichlet distribution. An important choice is here the prior for the expected number of cases per day, i.e. \(\lambda_t\) in the notation of Höhle and an der Heiden (2014). In the conjugate case this is specified by assuming an iid. Gamma-distribution for \(\lambda_t\), which is specified through prior mean and prior variance of the Gamma distribution. We here select here an empirical Bayes inspired approach and estimate these parameters from the currently available data. However, note: These data are by definition of the problem incomplete. As a dirty fix we therefore just inflate the prior variance by a factor - as future work this needs to be improved upon by following a proper marginal likelihood approach.

nc.control <- list(
  N.tInf.prior = structure("poisgamma",
                           mean.lambda = mean(observed(sts)),
                           var.lambda = 5*var(observed(sts))
                           ),
  ##compute predictive distribution as wel, which is needed for some of the
  ##animations.
  predPMF = TRUE,
  dRange = so_range)

## Now run the nowcast (NA dates are removed from the dataset).
nc <- nowcast(now = now, when = nowcastDates, data = linelist,
              dEventCol = "Date.of.symptoms.onset",
              dReportCol = "Date.of.notification.to.WHO",
              method = "bayes.trunc", #use the conjugate generalized dirichlet
              aggregate.by = "1 day",
              D = 14, #adjust cases up to 2 weeks back.
              control = nc.control)
## Removed 13 records due to NA dates.

The resulting object is of class stsNC, which is just a class inheriting from the sts class. Hence, all the usual plotting functions apply to it. In addition, a plot of an stsNC object as shown below, contains the median of the pointwise predictive distribution (thick blue line) as well as equi-tailed 95% credibility regions (dashed orange lines).

plot(nc, legend.opts=NULL,
     xaxis.tickFreq=list("%d"=atChange,"%m"=atChange),
     xaxis.labelFreq=list("%d"=at2ndChange),xaxis.labelFormat="%d-%b",
     xlab="Time (days)",lty=c(1,1,1,1),lwd=c(1,1,2),
     ylab="No. symptom onsets",ylim=c(0,max(observed(nc),upperbound(nc),predint(nc),na.rm=TRUE)))

Finally, we can for stsNC objects show a simple non-parametric estimate of the delay distribution as a function of time using a window-smoothed approach with window width \(2w+1\), see Höhle and an der Heiden (2014) for details.

plot(nc, type="delay", dates=seq(so_range[1],now,by="1 day"),w=1)

The figure shows for each time point \(t\) the median as well as the 10% and 90% quantile of the empirical distribution of delays within the window of \(t-w,\ldots,t+w\). Note: This simple estimate ignores the right- truncation, hence, within the period of (now-D):now there will be a bias of these estimates towards shorter delays. This biased period is illustrated in the figure by the light-gray shaded area. Furthermore, the median of the model based estimate for the delay distribution is shown for the period of (now-m:now). From the figure one has the suspicion that the delay decreased a bit over time, but the decrease totally at the end could also be due to right-truncation. However, assuming a time-invariant delay distribution for the entire outbreak would probably give unsatisfactory results. Hence, we shall for each time point use only a moving window consisting of all observations occuring within the period (now-m):now. We select \(m=14\) for estimating the delay distribution.

This means that only the \(m+1\)=15 most recent days of the reporting triangle are considered at each instance of “now” when estimating the delay distribution, i.e. there will be 15 observations on number of reports with a delay of 0 days, there will be 14 observationson on number of reports with a delay of 1 day, …, there will be 1 observation on number of reports with a delay 14 days. Based on the right-truncation adjusted estimation procedure these observations then lead to an estimate of the PMF of the delay. Due to the sliding window this estimate will be more uncertain (especially for the long delays), but if the delay reduces over time, this is more appropriately reflected, because old cases do not contribute to the delay estimation anymore.

Showing a sequence of nowcasts

Once a couple of nowcasts have been performed it can also be helpful to visualize the sequence of nowcasts using an animation. This is easily done by first generating a list of nowcast results followed by a call to surveillance::animate_nowcasts.

##Nowcast all time points (except for the first three weeks). This might take a while.
nowcasts <- list()
animRange <- seq(so_range[1]+21,so_range[2],by="1 day")

##Do nowcasts for the rage of dates
for (i in seq_len(length(animRange))) {
  today <- animRange[i]
  print(as.character(today))

  new_nowcastDates <- seq(from = so_range[1], to = today - safePredictLag, by = 1)

  nowcasts[[as.character(today)]] <- nowcast(
    now = today, when = new_nowcastDates, data = linelist,
    dEventCol = "Date.of.symptoms.onset",
    dReportCol = "Date.of.notification.to.WHO",
    method = "bayes.trunc",
    aggregate.by = "1 day",
    D = 14,
    m = 14, ##moving window of 14+1 days for estimation
    control = nc.control)
}

We will use the animation package to wrap the call to animate_nowcasts in order to generate an animated GIF. Better control over the obtained animation can be obtained using the animation::saveHTML function. If one wants to include the animation into a Power-Point presentation, I recommend the use of Flash animations (animation::saveSWF). Note that the animation package requires ImageMagick to be installed on your system.

animation::saveGIF( {
  par(mar=c(5.5, 4, 2, 2) + 0.1) ; ##add extra space at the bottom and remove at top
  animate_nowcasts(nowcasts = nowcasts,
                   linelist_truth = linelist,
                   method = "bayes.trunc", #nowcast method to use (has to be in the casts)
                   control = list(sys.sleep=0,dRange=nc.control$dRange,anim.dRange=range(animRange),ylim=c(0,40))) },
  movie.name="animate-nowcasts.gif", ani.width=800, ani.height=500)

As a final comparison we can also obtain an animation of how the delay distribution changes with time. From the animation we notice that the delay appears to steadily decrease, which is a typical behavior for high-profiled outbreaks. However, this also questions the assumption of a time-invariant delay distribution. Instead, one could use a window-limited estimation approach or one could try to model the delay distribution using a discrete time survival model as done in Höhle and an der Heiden (2014). The animation below uses the above mentioned sliding-window approach, which is noticed by the estimate of \(q_{0.5}^{\text{bayes.trunc(T)}}\) changing for each \(T\).

animation::saveGIF(
  for (i in seq_len(length(nowcasts))) {
    plot(nowcasts[[i]], w=3, type="delay")
  },
  movie.name="animate-delays.gif", ani.width=800, ani.height=500)

Discussion

The adjustment of occurred-but-not-yet-reported-events applies to many other application areas besides real-time public health monitoring. For example, direct links to claims reserve modelling in actuarial sciences exist, but many other areas of application, where delays play a role, appear of interest. For the methodological details of the nowcasting procedures see Höhle and an der Heiden (2014), which is available as open access document. The present blog entry focused on getting methods operational using R - the R code of this blog post is available from github.

Acknowledgements

Work on the surveillance package was supported by the Swedish Research Council (2015_05182_VR).

References

Höhle, M., and M. an der Heiden. 2014. “Bayesian Nowcasting During the STEC O104:H4 Outbreak in Germany, 2011.” Biometrics 70 (4): 993–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12194.

Salmon, M., D. Schumacher, and M. Höhle. 2016. “Monitoring Count Time Series in R: Aberration Detection in Public Health Surveillance.” Journal of Statistical Software 70 (10). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v070.i10.